Upwards vs. Downwards: How Power Dynamics Define the Severity of Workplace Swearing
News

Upwards vs. Downwards: How Power Dynamics Define the Severity of Workplace Swearing

In the complex social ecosystem of a workplace, not all words are created equal. This is especially true for swearing. A curse muttered under your bre

A Whole New Approach
A Whole New Approach
3 min read

In the complex social ecosystem of a workplace, not all words are created equal. This is especially true for swearing. A curse muttered under your breath after a frustrating email is one thing; an expletive-filled rant directed at a person is another. But employment law delves even deeper, drawing a critical distinction based on the direction of the profanity. Whether you are swearing at a subordinate, a peer, or a manager can fundamentally change the legal interpretation of your actions and determine whether you keep your job.

The crux of the issue lies in power dynamics. When a manager or business owner swears at an employee, it is rarely perceived as a simple exchange between equals. This was the central point in the case of Suhayl Ali, a Melbourne electrician who recorded his boss screaming abuse and profanities at him. The Fair Work Commission acknowledged that swearing was common in that industry. However, it ruled that the boss's behaviour was not acceptable "blue-collar" banter but an act of intimidation. The power imbalance was key. The boss's tirade was inherently threatening because of his authority to affect the employee’s livelihood. The language became a tool of bullying, creating a hostile environment and justifying the employee’s claim that he was forced to resign.

Conversely, swearing directed at a peer or even a superior can be viewed differently, although it is by no means without risk. The UK case of Robert Ogden, who was fired for swearing at a colleague, resulted in the dismissal being ruled unfair. A contributing factor was the "toxic" and permissive culture of the office, but it's also significant that this was an exchange between colleagues on a relatively even footing. While still unprofessional, it lacked the inherent intimidation factor of a boss-to-employee verbal assault.

This isn’t to say that swearing at a manager is a safe bet. Abusive, insubordinate, and threatening language directed "upwards" can, and often does, constitute gross misconduct. Refusing a legitimate instruction from a manager while peppering it with swear words, for example, is likely to be a fast track to dismissal. The context here shifts from bullying to insubordination, which is an equally serious offence.

What this tells us is that the severity of swearing is judged on a sliding scale. At the lower end is impersonal, generalised swearing as an expression of frustration. In the middle is profanity exchanged between peers, which is heavily dependent on workplace culture. At the highest and most serious end is language that exploits a power imbalance – either a manager bullying a subordinate or an employee showing gross insubordination to a manager. For anyone navigating workplace disputes, understanding these dynamics is crucial. It’s not just what you say; it’s who you say it to.

Read the original article here: https://awna.com.au/when-swearing-at-work-is-a-fireable-offence/

Discussion (0 comments)

0 comments

No comments yet. Be the first!